Scott Adams, making sense. Watch for the end when Nye goes off the rails about, of all things, political leaks.
The set-up is that Bill Nye, an engineer by training, and a proponent of science, is defending climate science on Tucker’s show...
Tucker then asked Nye a simple question about climate science. He asked how much of the warming is caused by human activity. Nye’s entire ego depended on knowing whether human activity is contributing to climate change in a big way, a medium way, or a small way. Tucker wanted some details. How much difference do humans make? After all, Nye had said this was settled science. Tucker just wanted to know what that settled science said.
Nye didn’t know. And by not knowing that simple answer about the percentage of human contribution to warming – the only issue that really mattered to the topic – he proved in public that his opinions on science are not based on facts or knowledge.
Comments